Davidson argues that you can only find a solution to the problem of Essay

Davidson argues that you can only find a solution to the problem of other minds if you take it that knowledge about one's own mi - Essay Example In this relation, he asserts that the three knowledge forms a tripod in which the absence of any of them automatically makes it unable to stand; hence, it remains that the tripod must always be in the complementary of the thee cardinal categories of knowledge (Davidson, The essential 64). What is evident in the Donald’s argument is how evidence can be adduced in relation to the three knowledge. In regard to the knowledge of the mind and that of immediate surroundings, he states that they are not subject to much proof since they are directly construed by an individual and do not need much proof. This is because he claims that the knowledge of immediate world is subject to the functionality of the organs of senses (Davidson, The essential 99). Finally, he stipulates that the most complex knowledge is that of other people, for one to understand what others think about, one has to learn their behavior first and use that as evidence about his knowledge. In this case, he argues that what one knows about others dictates what is in his mind, which also combines those that he knows about his immediate environment making them interdependent. Explanation of the Logical Interdependence In brief, the term â€Å"logical interdependence† can be considered as two different words that can then be evaluated independently before they are enjoined in order to find their meaning. There are three terms in the statement that needs to be discerned to ensure the holistic understanding of the whole statement that are; â€Å"logical†, â€Å"inter†, and â€Å"dependence†. Starting with the term â€Å"logical†, we have to note that it is derived from the word â€Å"logics† which means the ability to reason with certain guiding principles of validity such that the conclusion is not a subject to any alteration, oversight, or intentional inclusion of all material facts. This enables proper inference to be made with regard to a situation that ca lls for such. In doing this, we will be trying to find a reasonable way of creating a distinction from what is fallacious or false from the right and valid (Davidson 5). Considering the usage of the term ‘inter’ in the statement, it means between or among other things; hence, it shows some relationship that exist in two or more things. In this regard, it shows that there can be deduction that can be made from the independent things, and shows the thread that weaves them together demonstrating the relationship that exists in them. In this case, it demonstrates how the three varieties of knowledge are dependent to one another. Finally, the consideration of the term â€Å"dependence† reveals that great link and association of the three knowledge varieties and how they supplement one another (Davidson, Truth 132). As Donald rightfully puts it, you cannot separate the knowledge about self, immediate environment and that of others, as they do work in tandem to corrobor ate and informs other facets of knowledge. The certainty in this case is evident when Donald states that the knowledge of what others thinks also informs what is in his mind illustrating the linkage and interdependence. In as much as others perceive regarding what one thinks about after learning their behavior as stated by Donald, one is capable of making a conclusion of what they think rationally and once he does that, it informs what is in their mind in relation to what others are thinking about. Therefore, in as much as one knows what others are t